Skip to main content

I've Looked at Hamlet From Both Sides Now

This past Saturday five intrepid Oberon members braved the weather ("The air bites shrewdly; it is very cold"-Hamlet, Act I, scene 4) to attend a double-feature at the Hilberry Theatre in Detroit.

First up was Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead, then after a leisurely dinner it was off to Hamlet (by Shakespeare). It was a most enjoyable day. 

Stoppard's play is quite funny in its way. It is a kind of retelling of Hamlet from the point of view of the "minor characters" of R & G, in which they become the main characters with a large part also for the Players, while the "major characters" of Hamlet are relegated to "walk-on parts". It's kind of like being with R & G "offstage" during a performance of Hamlet, so that whenever they are supposed to appear in a scene of Hamlet, the other actors "come on" and do the scene (or a part of it) with them. In the interim, R & G talk among themselves or to the Players and muse about life, death, and other things. It's very "existential".

The main idea in the Stoppard play is that R & G are kind of "lost" and have no idea really why they are around or what they are supposed to be doing (shades of Waiting for Godot). They are kind of thrust into things beyond their control. This is summed up at the very end of the play by Guildenstern (or is it Rosencrantz?-sorry I couldn't resist that-it IS Guildenstern) when he says "There must have been a moment. at the beginning, where we could have said-no. But somehow we missed it."

This kind of thing is very entertaining, but it is not truly the R & G we know from Hamlet. In that play, they are quite aware of what they are doing (and it's no secret to Hamlet either). They are playing the game of court intrigue very well (although they lose out in the end). Of course, the audiences of Shakespeare's day would pick up on this right away (especially in the performances at court for which I believe this play was intended) and the author (Edward deVere) would have been well aware of this sort of thing himself (more than would be a "local yokel"). There is this kind of court intrigue in virtually all of Shakespeare's plays.

Anyway, I recommend the Stoppard play to all of you. There is also a film adaptation of it available (with screenplay by Stoppard himself) starring Tim Roth and Gary Oldman as R & G and featuring Richard Dreyfus as The Player.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was King Richard III a Control Freak? Science News ... from universities, journals, and other research organizations   Mar. 4, 2013 — University of Leicester psychologists believe Richard III was not a psychopath -- but he may have had control freak tendencies. University of Leicester psychologists have made an analysis of Richard III's character -- aiming to get to the man behind the bones. Professor Mark Lansdale, Head of the University's School of Psychology, and forensic psychologist Dr Julian Boon have put together a psychological analysis of Richard III based on the consensus among historians relating to Richard's experiences and actions. They found that, while there was no evidence for Shakespeare's depiction of Richard III as a psychopath, he may have had "intolerance to uncertainty syndrome" -- which may have manifested in control freak tendencies. The academics presented their findings on Saturday, March 2 at the University

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- " So me take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’" : Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said.  “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.”  She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female. The problem with cutting out the naug

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler  calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h