SOF Symposium2021 Highlight: Michael Dudley

Michael Dudley, MLIS MCP

Michael Dudley, MLIS MCP -- Community Outreach Librarian at the University of Winnipeg in Manitoba, Canada -- presented "The Stratfordian Belief System, Epistemic Injustice, and Academic Freedom" at the Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship's virtual spring symposium "The Shakespeare Attribution on April 10, 2021. Dudley's discuss is availabe on the SOF YouTube channel under the title, "SOF Spring International Online Symposium 2021". Dudley's presentation is introduced at hour 01:03:44.

In his presentation, Dudley argued that ". . . by calling [authorship] skeptics "conspiracy theorists" and comparing them to Holocaust deniers rather than addressing the substance of their claims, orthodox Shakespeare academics risk committing acts of epistemic vice, injustice and oppression, as well as foreclosing productive lines of inquiry in their discipline."

By categorizing the errors of the academy, Dudley's work gives Shakespeare authorship inquiry the tools to dismember the bulwark of Stratfordianism that James Warren called "institutional resistance".

Dudley's symposium presentation is based on a chapter he authored in Teaching and Learning Practices for Academic Freedom (Emerald Publishing, 2021) created in partnership with the International Higher Education Teaching and Learning Association. Dudley's chapter is titled "With Swinish Phrase Soiling Their Addition: Epistemic Injustice, Academic Freedom, and the Shakespeare Authorship Question". A pre-publication version of the book is available online.

In addition, Dudley will present this material in an hour-long program titled "Academic Freedom and the Shakespeare Authorship Question", a public, virtual event sponsored by the Heterodox Academy on May 7, 2021. Registration is free, online at the Heterodox Academy website.

"This is an hour-long presentation that will incorporate the SOF symposium presentation on virtue ethics, but will also serve as a general introduction to the Shakespeare authorship question for the uninitiated," Dudley said.

Dudley will further communicate this work in his article titled "Stratfordian Epistemology and the Ethics of Belief" to be published later this year in The Oxfordian 23 (2021)

"[The Oxfordian 23 article] is very much a companion to the book chapter," Dudley said. "But instead of looking at the ethical behavior of Stratfordians towards non-Stratfordians, it looks at the ethics of the traditional belief in the Stratfordian Shakespeare on its own terms, through the lens of Ethics of Belief theory, which argues that beliefs are only ethical and praiseworthy to the extent they are supported by evidence."

Michael Dudley: "The Stratfordian Belief System, Epistemic Injustice,

and Academic Freedom"

UPDATE: May 7, 2021
Michael Dudley will present "Epistemic Injustice, Academic Freedom and the Shakespeare Authorship Question" at the Canadian Society for the Study of Rhetoric conference, RhetCanada 2021, at 1 p.m. MDT June 4, 2021.

Resources

Event synopsis: SOF Spring International Online Symposium 2021, https://shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org/2021-spring-symposium/

Event video: SOF YouTube channel "SOF Spring International Online Symposium 2021", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvf2W8AaG3g

Michael Dudley video presentation: "The Stratfordian Belief System, Epistemic Injustice, and Academic Freedom, "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nPgVWHI6YE

Teaching and Learning Practices for Academic Freedom, Vol. 34
https://www.google.ca/books/edition/Teaching_and_Learning_Practices_for_Acad/h5wLEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&kptab=overview

"Academic Freedom and the Shakespeare Authorship Question" by Michael Dudley for the Heterodox Acadamy,
https://heterodoxacademy.org/events/academic-freedom-and-the-shakespeare-authorship-question/

"Stratfordian Epistemology and the Ethics of Belief" by Michael Dudley. The Oxfordian 23 (Fall, 2021) https://shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org/the-oxfordian/

Ethics of Belief, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-belief/

Canadian Society for the Study of Rhetoric, https://rhetcanada.org/

Was King Richard III a Control Freak? Science News ... from universities, journals, and other research organizations Mar. 4, 2013 — University of Leicester psychologists believe Richard III was not a psychopath -- but he may have had control freak tendencies. University of Leicester psychologists have made an analysis of Richard III's character -- aiming to get to the man behind the bones. Professor Mark Lansdale, Head of the University's School of Psychology, and forensic psychologist Dr Julian Boon have put together a psychological analysis of Richard III based on the consensus among historians relating to Richard's experiences and actions. They found that, while there was no evidence for Shakespeare's depiction of Richard III as a psychopath, he may have had "intolerance to uncertainty syndrome" -- which may have manifested in control freak tendencies. The academics presented their findings on Saturday, March 2 at the University

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- " So me take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’" : Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said. “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.” She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female. The problem with cutting out the naug

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h

Oberon Shakespeare Study Group

Search This Blog