Skip to main content

Warren's centennial history published

 by Linda Theil 


James A. Warren's epic centennial history of the Oxfordian movement was released last month by Warren's imprint Veritas Publications on Amazon.

Shakespeare Revolutionized: The First Hundred Years of J. Thomas Looney's Shakespeare Identified details the Oxfordian movement from its inception with the publication of Looney's foundational work in 1920 to the current moment of feverish fascination with the origin of Shakespeare's works.

We asked Warren to share his thoughts at this monumental accomplishment.

Oberon: Could you tell the story of how Shakespeare Revolutionized came to be and how long it took to create?

Warren: Four years of research followed by two years of mostly writing but also some research. The writing and revising took 20 months of 12-hour days.

Oberon: 
Could you tell some of the highlights of its content; both in terms of reader interest, and in terms of authorial satisfaction?

Warren: Until now, much information about the early decades of the Oxfordian movement has been lost. Of particular importance is the work of early scholars establishing the topical and personal nature of the plays and sonnets -- by Looney, Percy Allen, Admiral Holland, Eva Turner Clark, and others.

The importance of the historical information uncovered by the Wards [Col Bernard R. Ward and Capt. Bernard M. Ward] in chapter seven confirms the literary information drawn from the works themselves; the need for informed imagination to understand Shakespeare's works and the context in which they were created as shown by Looney, Percy Allen and others; and the importance of a correct understanding of the nature of genius and literary creativity -- all of which support Oxford's authorship and undermine Shakspere's.

These ideas are approached in various ways in many chapters throughout the book, and all are brought together in support of the strategies for completing the Oxfordian revolution outlined in the final two chapters.
 
Oberon: Was there any part that you found particularly difficult to write?

Warren: Chapters 19 and 20 were the hardest to write because I wanted to limit them to a short snapshot of the current movement. Initially one chapter, I eventually had to divide it into two chapters, and they still kept growing because I didn't want to omit important contributions to the Oxfordian cause. Although I think I found the optimal length and level of detail, I know there will be people unhappy that their important work wasn't discussed in greater detail.

Oberon: Please tell us that there will be an e-version forthcoming.

Warren: I don't think the many text boxes and images will appear well in an e-version; I will revisit this subject in September.

Oberon: Dare we ask, are you taking a vacation?

Warren: I have another big book coming out in September, in the same format as Shakespeare Revolutionized, and almost as many pages. Titled Shakespeare Investigated, its a collection of the 330 pieces that the Shakespeare Fellowship published before launching its News-letter in January 1937:
  • the SF column in The Hackney Spectator, 1922-1925 (124 pieces)
  • the SF circulars sent to members, 1922-1935 (90+ pieces)
  • the SF page in The Shakespeare Pictorial, 1929-1936 (100+ pieces)
It's an important collection because the pieces in it -- almost none ever been reprinted -- report on Oxfordian research as it was taking place. It was an exciting time in the movement, just like today.
 
In 1998 Roger Parisious wrote in The Elizabethan Review (vol. 6/2, Autumn 1998, p. 90), that "In the best interests of accurate Elizabethan scholarship, the entire run of inaccessible Shakespeare Fellowship proceedings (Hackney Spectator, 1922-1928, Shakespeare Pictorial, 1929-1937) should be assembled in one volume as quickly as possible."

Twenty-three years later it's finally happening with the publication of Shakespeare Investigated.

Shakespeare Investigated will be followed by a third book almost as long containing 450 letters exchanged between early Oxfordians 1920-1945. These letters provide an even more up-to-the-minute detailing of Oxfordian discoveries as they occurred.

So, slowly but surely, with these three big books: 
  •        Shakespeare Revolutionized -- examination of the effects of Shakespeare Identified over the past century (published July 2021)
  •        Shakespeare Investigated -- a collection of 330 pieces published by the Shakespeare Fellowship 1922-1936 (to be published in September 2021)
  •        Not yet titled -- a collection of 450 letters exchanged by Oxfordians 1920-1945 (to be published early in 2022)
the foundations of the Oxfordian movement are becoming accessible to anyone who wants to see them.

Oberon: Thanks to the indomitable talent and dedication of James Warren.


Resources


Shakespeare Revolutionized: The First Hundred Years of J. Thomas Looney's Shakespeare Identified by James A. Warren

https://www.amazon.com/SHAKESPEARE-REVOLUTIONIZED-Hundred-Shakespeare-Identified/dp/1733589430


"Warren to publish centennial book in 2020" Oberon weblog Feb. 28, 2020

http://oberonshakespearestudygroup.blogspot.com/2020/02/warren-to-publish-centennial-book-in.html


"Congratulations to SOF on March 4 2020 centennial celebration" Oberon weblog March 31, 2020

http://oberonshakespearestudygroup.blogspot.com/2020/03/open-letter-to-sof-re-march-4-2020.html


"SOF Symposium 2021: James Warren" Oberon weblog April 16, 2021

http://oberonshakespearestudygroup.blogspot.com/2021/04/sof-symposium2021-highlight-james-warren.html


James Warren video presentation "J. Thomas Looney and the Most Revolutionary Book in the History of Shakespeare Studies" at  Shakespeare Identified Centennial Symposium, March 4, 2020 

James Warren video presentation at SOF Symposium April 10, 2021: "The Oxfordian Movement and Academia", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qoyz4V5UNU0


Popular posts from this blog

Was King Richard III a Control Freak? Science News ... from universities, journals, and other research organizations   Mar. 4, 2013 — University of Leicester psychologists believe Richard III was not a psychopath -- but he may have had control freak tendencies. University of Leicester psychologists have made an analysis of Richard III's character -- aiming to get to the man behind the bones. Professor Mark Lansdale, Head of the University's School of Psychology, and forensic psychologist Dr Julian Boon have put together a psychological analysis of Richard III based on the consensus among historians relating to Richard's experiences and actions. They found that, while there was no evidence for Shakespeare's depiction of Richard III as a psychopath, he may have had "intolerance to uncertainty syndrome" -- which may have manifested in control freak tendencies. The academics presented their findings on Saturday, March 2 at the University

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- " So me take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’" : Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said.  “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.”  She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female. The problem with cutting out the naug

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler  calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h