Skip to main content

Michigan Shakespeare Festival Opens

I was happy to be in Jackson for the official opening of the 2010 Season of the Michigan Shakespeare Festival yesterday. I attended the first (of two) preview performances of The Comedy of Errors and the opening night performance of Romeo and Juliet. Both productions were good (in my own opinion), but Romeo and Juliet was much better.

Perhaps this is part due to the fact that R&J is "better" play, or is tragedy (although structured as a comedy until the very end). Shakespearean comedies (especially the "early ones") are more difficult (in my opinion again) to stage properly. They are full of long passages of puns and somewhat obscure allusions (to modern ears) as well as references to law, classical works, "aristocratic" interests, etc.

These puns and allusions would go over much better for performances at the royal court, at private houses (of the wealthy) or in the Inns of the Temple (law schools such as Gray's Inn) and I am convinced that these comedies were written for these venues. In fact, I'm not sure that these plays (I'm thinking particularly of Comedy of Errors, Two Gentlemen of Verona, and Loves' Labours' Lost) were EVER performed on the "public stage". There are no records of such performances (although, admittedly, there were better records kept of court performances and much of our knowledge of the performances of plays come from entries in diaries of the time [which were usually kept by the more educated people in the society who would probably see the plays at such venues as the royal court, private houses, or the Inns of the Temple]).

The first two of these plays were never printed until the First Folio in 1623, again suggesting (to me) that there was not much call for them from the public (who would, presumably, not have seen them). In opposition to this argument however is the fact that LLL was published in Quarto form (in 1598) and, moreover, was the first such "Shakespeare" play to actually have the author's name attached ("newly corrected and augmented by W. Shakespeare"). All three of these plays WERE mentioned by Francis Meres in 1598 in his list of plays by Shakespeare.

In any case, the presence of these comedic elements in the plays is very problematic for a modern director, which makes these plays (in my opinion) more difficult. In the present case (at Jackson) the director (as far as I could tell from his bio in the program) has never directed Shakespeare before (although he has done some "classical" work) so maybe he found himself particularly challenged.

His solution to the problem is much the same as that used by many Shakespearean directors facing this problem. It is to "do the jokes fast" and "cover them up" with music or funny accents or other stage business. This kind of "dumbs the play down" for the audience since it is basically telling them, "Yes, we know you won't get any or these jokes, so just believe us that they are funny and don't even bother trying to listen to the words." In fact, in the performance I saw last night, the actor playing Dromio of Ephesus (or maybe Syracuse, it's hard to tell them apart, you know), after delivering one of these stream of puns and allusions (it is usually the "lower class or servant" characters who do these) actually says to the audience, "These are the jokes, folks." I don't know if this was an ad lib by the actor or was intended by the director (I suspect the latter).

Well, anyway, I DID see a preview performance, so I will wait to see the performance on July 31 (when some of the "rough edges" may be gone).

On the other hand, the performance of Romeo and Juliet was very good. This is in part due to it being the "flagship" production of the MSF season (it has the most performances) and to it being directed by someone with a lot more experience with Shakespeare. Of course it was "trimmed" a little (you pretty much have to do that with Shakespeare in order to fit it into a manageable performance time). I particularly liked the way the director "juggled and partially cut down a few scenes" in order to perform much of Act III, scene 3 (leaving out the presence of the Nurse) and the last half of Act III, scene 2 at essentially the same time (by having them take place at opposite ends of the stage and moving back and forth between them, a few lines at a time). These are basically scenes right after the murder of Tybalt where Friar Lawrence is comforting Romeo and the Nurse is comforting Juliet. I liked the parallel nature of these scenes (the father and mother figures). All in all, a very enjoyable performance.

I remind Oberoners that we are planning a "group outing" to see both of these productions on July 31 and we (well, mostly I) will be doing a "Bard Talk" at 6:30 before the performance of Comedy of Errors at 7:30. I hope to see you all there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was King Richard III a Control Freak? Science News ... from universities, journals, and other research organizations   Mar. 4, 2013 — University of Leicester psychologists believe Richard III was not a psychopath -- but he may have had control freak tendencies. University of Leicester psychologists have made an analysis of Richard III's character -- aiming to get to the man behind the bones. Professor Mark Lansdale, Head of the University's School of Psychology, and forensic psychologist Dr Julian Boon have put together a psychological analysis of Richard III based on the consensus among historians relating to Richard's experiences and actions. They found that, while there was no evidence for Shakespeare's depiction of Richard III as a psychopath, he may have had "intolerance to uncertainty syndrome" -- which may have manifested in control freak tendencies. The academics presented their findings on Saturday, March 2 at the University

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- " So me take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’" : Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said.  “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.”  She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female. The problem with cutting out the naug

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler  calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h