Skip to main content

Dillon plays DeVere in Worchester, England Jan. 14, 2011

Reporter Lauren Rogers sums up Edward de Vere's "disgraceful" life in her Dec. 17., 2010 Worchester News article, "Is this the real Bard?" announcing playwright George Dillon's one-man show about DeVere, The Man Who Was Hamlet  that opens next month at the Number 8 Community Arts Center in Worchester, England. Rogers said:
Edward de Vere was a courtier, swordsman, adventurer, playwright and poet. He killed a servant, made love to Queen Elizabeth, abandoned his wife, got his mistress pregnant, was maimed in a duel, travelled in Italy, was captured by pirates, fought the Armada, was imprisoned in the Tower of London, kept two companies of players, and then disappeared from history for 15 years before dying virtually bankrupt. In youth he was hailed as the best of the secret court writers, but no plays bearing his name have survived and his poetry suddenly stopped after the first invention of 'William Shake-speare'.
Traditional Shakespeare scholar James Shapiro finds this biographical approach to solving the Shakespeare authorship mystery so alarmingly convincing that he wrote a book defending the Stratfordian viewpoint, Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare?. In his book published this year, Shapiro argues that finding an artist in his work is a modern concept that can't be applied to Shakespeare's creative output because Elizabethans had no notion of biography.

This is like arguing that Elizabethans didn't have life stories because no one wrote them. 

In any case, Shapiro is mistaken in thinking that DeVere's life story in Shakespeare's plays is the vital component of anti-Stratfordianism. The undeniable impetus for denying the Stratfordian candidate as author of Shakespeare's work is the Stratford man's utter lack of connection to the life of an artist: no books, no letters, no manuscripts, no travel, no study in any field, no acknowledgement of his writing by local peers, and -- based on his signatures -- his apparent illiteracy. 

Other Shakespeare traditionalists besides Shapiro also seek ways to defend against encroachment on their point-of-view. Hardy Cook recently lifted his longstanding ban on any mention of the authorship question on his Shaksper Global Electronic Shakespeare Conference to open a discussion of how traditionalists should respond to Roland Emmerich's film Anonymous that features DeVere as Shakespeare and debuts September 23, 2011. Ridicule of anti-Stratfordian views was offered as a favored tactic by some correspondents, but pervasive bullying has not daunted curiosity in the past and will not stem the tide in the present. History has been imagined by the Stratfordians for too long.

Sources:
Shaksper Conference: http://www.shaksper.net/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- " So me take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’" : Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said.  “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.”  She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female. The problem with cutting out the naug

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler  calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h

Dudley nails it to the door

Michael Dudley author of The Shakespeare Authorship Question and Philosphy: Knowledge, Rhetoric, Identity (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2023) Michael Dudley views his vocation of librarian at the University of Manitoba with dialectic rigor. "Librarianship has a duty to inform democracy," he said in Kathryn Sharpe's virtual bookclub on April 27, 2024. Dudley discussed his new book The Shakespeare Authorship Question and Philosophy: Knowledge, Rhetoric, Identity published by Cambridge Scholars Publishing last fall. Update 08/21/24 Dudley's book is also available as an ebook from   Google Play . In SAQ and Philosophy Dudley uses the hammer of logic to nail his accusations against the barricaded door of the Shakespeare citadel. "The question of Shakespeare's authorship is a malformed debate practiced in an unethical fashion," Dudley said. When asked why his book is important, Dudley said: "What sets my book apart from others on the authorship quest