Skip to main content

Oberon August report

In past years, Oberon has not often met in August, substituting an outing for a meeting. This year we are doing both. Some of us will be attending The Merchant of Venice in Stratford, Ontario this Saturday, the 25th. In the meantime, a gratifyingly good turnout appeared for the regular meeting on Thursday, August 16. Thank you to Sue, Linda, Mara, Robin, Rey, Richard, Tom, Joy, Barb, and Rosey for making it another enjoyable evening.

There were three highlights in addition to our reliable Treasurer’s Report.

The first was Linda’s presentation on the possibilities of the blog in which she created a entry for our Oberon blog on the computer in front of our very eyes. (See Aug. 16 photo and entry below.) Will the marvels of this electronic age never cease? In addition to being impressive, Linda’s demonstration showed us that blogging offers many possibilities and opportunities to Oberon, including facilitating communication among members; creating a record of members’ thoughts, activities, and research results, among others; and connecting us to the internet, since blog content should show up in search results. Linda has taken the online ball and run with it for us. We owe her many thanks. I have a feeling the best is yet to come.

The second highlight was the report by Rey Perez about the personal e-mail he received from Irwin Matus as a result of Rey’s foray into the Folger during which he met Mr. Matus and struck up a warm acquaintance. Suffice it to say that Mr. Matus has his doubts about any Oxfordian other than Rey, but Rey is to be congratulated for getting through to at least one orthodox Shakespearean. Yes, Mr. Matus, Rey Perez is abundantly human. He’s a good guy. He’s knowledgeable. You have already discovered that. And we like to think that there are more Oxfordians like him than have yet been dreamt of in your philosophy. We may have our differences but, as Patrick Stewart said, we are all Shakespeareans.

The third highlight was a complete surprise for the group. We knew that Barbara Burris has been working on a novel. We know of Barbara Burris’ excellent research into the authorship issue, especially her work reported in the New York Times about the Ashbourne portrait which hangs in the Folger and whose subject was originally referred to as Shakespeare. We knew that she asked to read a chapter or two of her novel at a meeting. Well, she did that on Thursday, and what we didn’t know—but should have—is how excellent it appears to be. Barbara apparently can add fiction to her list of accomplishments. Every word was a delight. Barb said she has a long way to go, but if the rest of it is as good as the part we heard, she should have a success on her hands. It is a mystery with a working title Portrait of Deceit: the Shakespeare Murders. It evolves from her work on the Ashbourne, and it skillfully touches on authorship issues in interesting ways. We are hoping that Barbara will keep us in the loop as the book takes shape, and we thank her for bringing it to us.

Finally, Tom reported briefly on the Utah Shakespeare Festival and some highjinks that occurred when he found Will Shakespeare sitting on a park bench inside the festival theatre.

Next meeting is Thursday, Sept. 20. Linda invited Oberon members to her home on Sept 23 for a special potluck get together. Please check with Linda for details.

Tom Hunter
Oberon Chair

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was King Richard III a Control Freak? Science News ... from universities, journals, and other research organizations   Mar. 4, 2013 — University of Leicester psychologists believe Richard III was not a psychopath -- but he may have had control freak tendencies. University of Leicester psychologists have made an analysis of Richard III's character -- aiming to get to the man behind the bones. Professor Mark Lansdale, Head of the University's School of Psychology, and forensic psychologist Dr Julian Boon have put together a psychological analysis of Richard III based on the consensus among historians relating to Richard's experiences and actions. They found that, while there was no evidence for Shakespeare's depiction of Richard III as a psychopath, he may have had "intolerance to uncertainty syndrome" -- which may have manifested in control freak tendencies. The academics presented their findings on Saturday, March 2 at the University

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- " So me take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’" : Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said.  “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.”  She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female. The problem with cutting out the naug

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler  calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h