Skip to main content

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- "Some take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’":
Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said. “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.” She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female.
The problem with cutting out the naughty bits in R&J is that one would be left with a tattered tale, indeed. In Filthy Shakespeare, author Pauline Kiernan says:
Romeo and Juliet is one of the most famous tragedies about love in Western literature. It is also one of Shakespeare’s bawdiest plays. Its plethora of sexual puns gives the play a levity which some critics have found inappropriate.
One might make the argument that any naughty bit that must be glossed might be considered titillation-free. Kiernan gives this example of Mercutio's gutter-minded exuberance when speaking in Act II, scene 1 of Romeo's first-love Rosaline:

O, Romeo that she were, O that she were
An open-arse and thou a popp'rin' pear.

This open-arse, Kiernan says, is a reference to a Medlar fruit that has a cleft (like a peach, perhaps) and is nicknamed in Elizabethan parlance an “open-arse”. The popp’rin’ pear is a Poperinghe pear from Flanders/Belgium -- perhaps what we call a Buerre Bosc pear -- that was shaped like an erect penis. 

That's a long way to go for a little amusement.

Mercutio's line objected to by parent Crowley: “What has thou found. No hare, sir, unless a hare, sir, sit in a Lenten pie.” is similarly dense -- something about a whore and no meat. I don't get it.

Jackson Citizen Patriot 4/21/10 article by James Wheaton
A Dictionary of Shakespeare's Sexual Puns and Their Significance by Frankie Rubenstein (McMillan, 1984 & 1989)
Filthy Shakespeare by Pauline Keirnan (Cuercus, 2006) by Jeremy Abrams


Popular posts from this blog

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler  calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h

Orloff calls Shapiro an asshole

  Screenwriter John Orloff and actor Rhys Ifans featured on  title card of today's  Don't Quill the Messenger podcast by Linda Theil In a long reminiscence of Rolland Emmerich's 2011 film Anonymous,  screenwriter John Orloff recalled Robert (sic) Shapiro as an "asshole". Twice. In the Oct 20, 2023 "Not so Anonymous" episode of his anti-Stratfordian  Don't Quill the Messenger podcast, host Steven Sabel spoke to Orloff for over an hour about the making of Emmerich's epic flop that brought the Shakespeare authorship question to international prominence. (See:  "Anonymous Opens . . ." , et al on Oberon  weblog.) At time-mark 38:30 during a discussion of the Anonymous post-release furor, Orloff opined regarding Shakespearean scholar James Shapiro -- although Orloff did Shapiro the ultimate disrespect of not remembering his first name correctly: "Robert (sic) Shapiro! Oof, that guy! . . . he's such a dishonest broker. Above anythin