Skip to main content

George Hunter essay


Oberon member George Hunter offers the following essay for readers' consideration.

Authorship as a University Discipline: Shakespeare vs The Earl of Oxford
The Question
     How can authorship become a university discipline?
The Solution
     Research must have a two-fold interest, one, to deal with matters of general interest to current university disciplines; and second, to also deal with matters of interest to the question of authorship.   Some of this research may already exist. 
 
Examples of Research with a Two-fold Interest.
     How does a current theatrical company respond to a new play?  Is the playwright present during rehearsals?  Does the cast offer new dialogue?  How often is there a major rewrite of the play?  Does someone else work the script rather than the playwright?  These are questions of interest to university disciplines but may also throw light on the question of authorship, that is, how could a play, written by Oxford,  be transformed into a theatrical performance ascribed to Shakespeare?
      Variety, a show business publication, has a wealth of information about the current and past theater.  Is there a record of a secret playwright?  How do theater people communicate with each other?  Does everybody know each other's business?  How difficult is it to keep a secret?  Again, these are questions of general interest which also deal with the question of how the Earl of Oxford's authorship was kept a secret.
     In the early British navy,  sailors could not speak out against an officer, but  they could express their feelings in song without fear of reprisal.  In Soviet Russia there were songs, jokes, and jingles expressing negative feelings about the government.  What evidence is there of songs, jokes, and jingles in general but also about the authorship question. 
 Summary   
     This approach will constitute a defacto recognition of the authorship question as a university discipline in which there is reasonable doubt about both Shakespeare and the Earl of Oxford as authors of the body of literature currently ascribed to William Shakespeare.  The goal is to develop a body of evidence both for and against both William Shakespeare and the Earl of Oxford.  
 
Addendum
     About two months ago I emailed a gist of the above (I can't find a copy of the email) to ten acting companies associated with universities and ten to community or professional acting companies. I did not expect to, and did not, get a response but I hope that someone in the future will consider the issue and eventually respond in some way. This may be our best access to a university discipline.
 George Hunter, a.k.a. Tommy Mysliwiec
    Retired Social Worker
    Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was King Richard III a Control Freak? Science News ... from universities, journals, and other research organizations   Mar. 4, 2013 — University of Leicester psychologists believe Richard III was not a psychopath -- but he may have had control freak tendencies. University of Leicester psychologists have made an analysis of Richard III's character -- aiming to get to the man behind the bones. Professor Mark Lansdale, Head of the University's School of Psychology, and forensic psychologist Dr Julian Boon have put together a psychological analysis of Richard III based on the consensus among historians relating to Richard's experiences and actions. They found that, while there was no evidence for Shakespeare's depiction of Richard III as a psychopath, he may have had "intolerance to uncertainty syndrome" -- which may have manifested in control freak tendencies. The academics presented their findings on Saturday, March 2 at the University

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- " So me take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’" : Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said.  “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.”  She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female. The problem with cutting out the naug

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler  calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h