Skip to main content

McClarran's I Come to Bury Shaksper

A year ago in December 2010, when we Oberons gathered for our annual holiday feast at Tom and Rosey Hunter’s house, Tom was filled with enthusiasm for an unpublished work that he had just read, Steve McClarran’s I Come to Bury Shaksper, now available for the Kindle at Amazon.

Upon receiving McClarran’s manuscript in November 2010, Tom had told the author, with characteristic warmth and humor: “We will be getting together with the family to celebrate Thanksgiving tomorrow. I have a feeling that I will be huddled up in a corner with your book. Just hope I don't get gravy all over it. Will report back as soon as I have something substantive to say or as soon as I think I have something substantive to say, whichever occurs first.”

Within days, he reported to McClarran:
“I have been waiting for the let down, and it hasn't come. The book gets better and better as it goes. The probing jabs have become body blows, and I hear air whooshing out of the Stratfordian punching bag. . . . Will try to find time to be more detailed. I just hope that this great work doesn't get put aside and benefit no one except now perhaps me . . . and anyone else to whom you have shown it.  I hope it gets published in some form soon because I want it to be there for me to refer to.”

When Tom told us about this work, we all wanted to read it, so we were delighted to hear that McClarran recently published his work as an eBook with Kindle.

“Putting the book on Amazon-Kindle is easy except for the main document upload,” McClarran said. “It's all done on the computer. You never deal with a person. Well, actually the upload is easy, it's getting the document ready for the upload that was a challenge. I spent at least 100 hours modifying the Word document so it would reformat properly to html and Kindle.”

I Come to Bury Shaksper: A Deconstruction of the Fable of the Stratfordian Shake-speare and the Supporting Scholarship by Steve McClarran was released December 9, 2011. Although our dear friend Tom Hunter is no longer with us, we have received the benefit of his encouragement of McClarran’s work.

McClarran describes I Come to Bury Shaksper:
This is the story of what is perhaps the greatest failure in the annals of scholarship, of institutionalized self-deception, vested interest, and corrupt methodology.  This book is a frontal attack on the absurd foundational assumptions and made-up facts that serve as the foundation of Shaksper’s biography ‘as Shakespeare’, in what is known as the Stratfordian Tradition, on the failure of mainstream scholars to apply the science of psychology and basic common sense to the problems of Shakespeare’s creative development and aspirations, on the myth of the dating of Shakespeare’s works, the so-called Standard Chronology, and the outrageous fiction that the Stratford grammar school was a world-class center of classical learning. This book is aimed at those who are relatively unfamiliar with Shakespeare and the Shakespeare authorship question, but it also a challenge to the defenders of the Stratfordian Tradition to deal with fundamental questions they have been avoiding for more than two centuries.
About the Author: Steve McClarran is an independent scholar who has spent more than ten years studying the Shakespeare authorship question.  His professional background is in management and organizational analysis with the US Army (Federal employee, retired).  A native of California, the author currently lives in Germany.

Note: Order I Come to Bury Shaksper to read on your PC, Mac, iPhone, iPad, Blackberry or Android by downloading Amazon's free Kindle software. The Kindle edition is $9.99.

UPDATE 02/15/12: I Come to Bury Shaksper is now available in paperback at a cost of $22.95 at CreateSpace: https://www.createspace.com/3751057

UPDATE 04/07/18
Here is the link Steve Steinburg sent of "latest edition" 

No Kindle version available at this date.

Popular posts from this blog

Was King Richard III a Control Freak? Science News ... from universities, journals, and other research organizations   Mar. 4, 2013 — University of Leicester psychologists believe Richard III was not a psychopath -- but he may have had control freak tendencies. University of Leicester psychologists have made an analysis of Richard III's character -- aiming to get to the man behind the bones. Professor Mark Lansdale, Head of the University's School of Psychology, and forensic psychologist Dr Julian Boon have put together a psychological analysis of Richard III based on the consensus among historians relating to Richard's experiences and actions. They found that, while there was no evidence for Shakespeare's depiction of Richard III as a psychopath, he may have had "intolerance to uncertainty syndrome" -- which may have manifested in control freak tendencies. The academics presented their findings on Saturday, March 2 at the University

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- " So me take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’" : Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said.  “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.”  She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female. The problem with cutting out the naug

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler  calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h