Skip to main content

Richard Paul Roe passed away today in Pasadena CA

Daniel Wright, PhD, director of the Richard Paul and Jane Roe Shakespeare Authorship Research Centre at Concordia University in Portland Oregon, reported with great grief the death of Richard Paul Roe, 88, in Pasadena, California today. Wright said:
Dick and his wife, Jane, who survives him, were grand and active Oxfordians. Dick just published last year his breakthrough work of a lifetime -- one of the most important studies in the Shakespeare authorship question ever: The Shakespeare Guide to Italy. I was honored to attend a reception for Dick in Pasadena at the release of his book last year. We are all pleased, given this sad news, that Dick was able to receive the enthusiastic accolades of friends and supporters before his death for undertaking, and seeing through to completion, this titanic accomplishment -- the result of decades of travel, investigation and meticulous research, jaw-dropping in its significance. For this achievement Dick was slated to receive the Concordia University's Vero Nihil Verius Award for Distinguished Scholarship at the forthcoming Shakespeare Authorship Studies Conference in April, 2011.
Wright said the award will be given posthumously. Wright also reported previously that Roe's book -- The Shakespeare Guide to Italy, previously privately available in a small print-run -- will be published next year by Harper Collins. 


Oxfordian luminary Stephanie Hughes gave us permission to quote her response to the sad news of Roe's death:
Apart from the stunning information it contains, The Shakespeare Guide to Italy is also a very beautiful and engaging book. In my view (and leaving Oxford aside) Roe's lifework is the most important book about Shakespeare to be published in our time. I believe the winds of awareness will finally begin to blow in our direction once it's out there.
But sad as it is that he should miss this moment, I think that Dick would agree that the purest joy was in the doing. Nothing could ever match those marvelous trips to Italy, the excitement of the chase and the thrill of discovery. How wonderful that he's captured this for us, taking us with him as he locates, again and again, with the skill of a great detective the very sites where events in Shakespeare took place.
Much credit must go to Dick and Jane's daughter Hilary Roe Metternich and to designer Steve Hirsch for their efforts to see this exceptional book into print. And thanks to Dan Wright as well for his part in introducing us to Dick and giving so many of us the opportunity at the Concordia conferences to hear his lawerly briefs in behalf of Oxford. Many thanks to all involved.
Hank Whittemore, author of Shakespeare's Son and His Sonnets (published Dec. 1, 2010 by Martin and Lawrence Press and available from Amazon) also expressed gratitude for Roe's lifework and his response on hearing of Roe's death:
I grabbed his wonderful book The Shakespeare Guide to Italy, Then and Now off the shelf and read the opening sentences of his introduction: "There is a secret Italy hidden in the plays of Shakespeare. It is an ingeniously-described Italy that has neither been recognized, nor even suspected -- not in four hundred years -- save by a curious few. It is exact; it is detailed; and it is brilliant." What a gift he has given us!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was King Richard III a Control Freak? Science News ... from universities, journals, and other research organizations   Mar. 4, 2013 — University of Leicester psychologists believe Richard III was not a psychopath -- but he may have had control freak tendencies. University of Leicester psychologists have made an analysis of Richard III's character -- aiming to get to the man behind the bones. Professor Mark Lansdale, Head of the University's School of Psychology, and forensic psychologist Dr Julian Boon have put together a psychological analysis of Richard III based on the consensus among historians relating to Richard's experiences and actions. They found that, while there was no evidence for Shakespeare's depiction of Richard III as a psychopath, he may have had "intolerance to uncertainty syndrome" -- which may have manifested in control freak tendencies. The academics presented their findings on Saturday, March 2 at the University

What's a popp'rin' pear?

James Wheaton reported yesterday in the Jackson Citizen Patriot that the Michigan Shakespeare Festival high school tour of Romeo and Juliet was criticized for inappropriate content -- " So me take issue with sexual innuendoes in Michigan Shakespeare Festival’s High School Tour performances of ‘Romeo & Juliet’" : Western [High School] parent Rosie Crowley said she was upset when she heard students laughing about sexual content in the play afterwards. Her son didn’t attend the performance Tuesday because of another commitment, she said.  “I think the theater company should have left out any references that were rated R,” Crowley said. “I would say that I’ve read Shakespeare, and what I was told from the students, I’ve never read anything that bad.”  She said she objected to scenes that involved pelvic thrusting and breast touching and to a line in which Mercutio makes suggestive comments to Romeo after looking up the skirt of a female. The problem with cutting out the naug

Winkler lights the match

by Linda Theil When asked by an interviewer why all the experts disagree with her on the legitimacy of the Shakespeare authorship question, journalist and author Elizabeth Winkler  calmly replied, "You've asked the wrong experts." * With that simple declaration Winkler exploded the topic of Shakespearean authorship forever. Anti-Stratfordians need no smoking gun, no convincing narrative, no reason who, how, when, or why because within the works lies the unassailable argument: Shakespeare's knowledge. Ask the lawyers. Ask the psychologists. Ask the librarians. Ask the historians. Ask the dramaturges. Ask the mathematicians. Ask the Greek scholars. Ask the physicists. Ask the astronomers. Ask the courtiers. Ask the bibliophiles. Ask the Italians. Ask the French. Ask the Russians. Ask the English. Ask everyone. Current academic agreement on a bevy of Shakespearean collaborators springs from an unspoken awareness of how much assistance the Stratfordian presumptive would h